- Joined
- Jul 31, 2013
- Messages
- 480
DegenR(g)ambler said:Early week 1 plays:
452 Denver -9
482 SD +3'
May have more later in the week.
CGI_Ram said:DegenR(g)ambler said:Early week 1 plays:
452 Denver -9
482 SD +3'
May have more later in the week.
Okay; I do play sports bets. It's legal here in Canada as part of the lottery system
How do I read your "week 1 plays"?
Are you saying take Denver -9 and San Diego +3?
CGI_Ram said:DegenR(g)ambler said:Early week 1 plays:
452 Denver -9
482 SD +3'
May have more later in the week.
Okay; I do play sports bets. It's legal here in Canada as part of the lottery system
How do I read your "week 1 plays"?
Are you saying take Denver -9 and San Diego +3?
Dagonet said:CGI_Ram said:DegenR(g)ambler said:Early week 1 plays:
452 Denver -9
482 SD +3'
May have more later in the week.
Okay; I do play sports bets. It's legal here in Canada as part of the lottery system
How do I read your "week 1 plays"?
Are you saying take Denver -9 and San Diego +3?
I was going to ask the same thing.
DegenR(g)ambler said:...the rams line has gone down from 6' or 7 earlier in the week to 4' as of last night. this means taht a lot of money is being bet on arizona in wk 1.
X said:Have you noticed a trend with regards to east coast teams that travel to the west coast for 1 pm games? The times I do bet I tend to zero in on those, particularly if the traveling team is favored and it's a non-conference game. It's almost always a winner.
I read that a few times, and it still doesn't add up. :lol: The east coast team is the victim during that kind of travel because of the jet lag and the earlier start. Fisher tends to leave a day earlier for games in which there's a negative time difference, and I think that's pretty smart. I can't understand why every team doesn't do something like that. And what's with the mysterious amount of stomach related "illnesses" that show up when a traveling team lodges in a visiting team's hotel. lol. Some shady cooks out there.DegenR(g)ambler said:also in regards to travel, typically it is worse when a west coast team goes east for a 1 pm est game. ie the west coast team is playing at 10 am pst.
CGI_Ram said:DegenR(g)ambler said:...the rams line has gone down from 6' or 7 earlier in the week to 4' as of last night. this means taht a lot of money is being bet on arizona in wk 1.
Thanks!
So when you see something like this happening; is it a good bet to take STL?
Is it just me, or do you two need to hook up on a weekly RODcast with the subject line as the show title?DegenR(g)ambler said:CGI_Ram said:DegenR(g)ambler said:...the rams line has gone down from 6' or 7 earlier in the week to 4' as of last night. this means taht a lot of money is being bet on arizona in wk 1.
Thanks!
So when you see something like this happening; is it a good bet to take STL?
yes, if you like st louis this week, now is the time to take them. i dont see the line going down anymore than what it has already. i would like it to be down around 3 before i took them personally. but giving 4' is definitely better than 7.
another thing on this note...key numbers in the nfl. i hope i dont sound like im contradicting myself by making the following statement with regards to the 4' vs 7 numbers mentioned above. normally key numbers in the nfl are 2', 3, 3', 6', 7, 7', 10 and 10'. what this means is that more times than not, nfl games are decided by these "key" numbers. keep in mind when you are betting that if you like the favorite, it is better to be giving only 2' or 6' vs giving 3, 3', 7, or 7'.
therefore with the rams this week, the 4' (not being a key number) is obviously, still better than being 7.
X said:I read that a few times, and it still doesn't add up. :lol: The east coast team is the victim during that kind of travel because of the jet lag and the earlier start. Fisher tends to leave a day earlier for games in which there's a negative time difference, and I think that's pretty smart. I can't understand why every team doesn't do something like that. And what's with the mysterious amount of stomach related "illnesses" that show up when a traveling team lodges in a visiting team's hotel. lol. Some shady cooks out there.DegenR(g)ambler said:also in regards to travel, typically it is worse when a west coast team goes east for a 1 pm est game. ie the west coast team is playing at 10 am pst.
X said:Is it just me, or do you two need to hook up on a weekly RODcast with the subject line as the show title?DegenR(g)ambler said:CGI_Ram said:DegenR(g)ambler said:...the rams line has gone down from 6' or 7 earlier in the week to 4' as of last night. this means taht a lot of money is being bet on arizona in wk 1.
Thanks!
So when you see something like this happening; is it a good bet to take STL?
yes, if you like st louis this week, now is the time to take them. i dont see the line going down anymore than what it has already. i would like it to be down around 3 before i took them personally. but giving 4' is definitely better than 7.
another thing on this note...key numbers in the nfl. i hope i dont sound like im contradicting myself by making the following statement with regards to the 4' vs 7 numbers mentioned above. normally key numbers in the nfl are 2', 3, 3', 6', 7, 7', 10 and 10'. what this means is that more times than not, nfl games are decided by these "key" numbers. keep in mind when you are betting that if you like the favorite, it is better to be giving only 2' or 6' vs giving 3, 3', 7, or 7'.
therefore with the rams this week, the 4' (not being a key number) is obviously, still better than being 7.
I mean, c'mon. It's right there in front of ya. :ww:
DegenR(g)ambler said:CGI_Ram said:DegenR(g)ambler said:Early week 1 plays:
452 Denver -9
482 SD +3'
May have more later in the week.
Okay; I do play sports bets. It's legal here in Canada as part of the lottery system
How do I read your "week 1 plays"?
Are you saying take Denver -9 and San Diego +3?
yes cgi. actually sd is @ 3.5. or at least they were last night. that is what the ' means next to the three.
one reason i like the sd game is because i always take the home under dog in primetime games.
also, as an fyi...the rams line has gone down from 6' or 7 earlier in the week to 4' as of last night. this means taht a lot of money is being bet on arizona in wk 1.
max said:DegenR(g)ambler said:CGI_Ram said:DegenR(g)ambler said:Early week 1 plays:
452 Denver -9
482 SD +3'
May have more later in the week.
Okay; I do play sports bets. It's legal here in Canada as part of the lottery system
How do I read your "week 1 plays"?
Are you saying take Denver -9 and San Diego +3?
yes cgi. actually sd is @ 3.5. or at least they were last night. that is what the ' means next to the three.
one reason i like the sd game is because i always take the home under dog in primetime games.
also, as an fyi...the rams line has gone down from 6' or 7 earlier in the week to 4' as of last night. this means taht a lot of money is being bet on arizona in wk 1.
Why do you think so much money is being bet on Arizona? I don't get the attraction to the Cards in this game.
CGI_Ram said:I kind of like;
Houston, St. Louis, and Seattle.