You're asking us?
I sure don't want to pick Robinson at 2 after the whole Jason Smith pick, I'd be all sorts of giddy if Clowney fell to us even if HOU traded the no. 1.I guess that was kind of a stupid question! I really meant to ask if anyone had heard more of that rumor and what were their thoughts/opinions.
why would jags spend two top 5 picks back to back on a tackle?
Jax is taken khalil mack , imo
Probably the WORST case scenario for the Rams. Wow, that would suck, IMHO.Yes OLT is a big need for the Falcons. I could see it. I don't like trading down to 6 though because the guy I want most is Matthews and EVERY year the best OTs go early. I could see Jacksonville, or Oakland taking Matthews. He is better than what they have at OLT.
Say it goes this way:
Houston - Mack
Atlanta - Robinson
Jacksonville - Matthews
Cleveland - Watkins
Oakland - Clowney
Rams - ?
The best players are off the board and the Rams would probably try to trade back a bit again. Would they take Evans at 6? Martin? Lewan? I think 6 is high for all of them. I really want them to get one of the top impact players out of this draft. It is Star time not filler time.
Maybe that means they trade with Dallas so they get Manziere. So the Rams move all the way out of the top ten completely. It would take one hell of a lot of good compensation for me to be happy about it. I usually don't get too uppity over drafts but this scenario would be a huge disappointment for me.
i think it will go like this if we trade
Hou:Clowney
Atl:Robinson
Jags:Mack
Cle: Watkins
Oak:Evans
Stl:Matthews
no way clowney doesnt go #1 imo
i think it will go like this if we trade
Hou:Clowney
Atl:Robinson
Jags:Mack
Cle: Watkins
Oak:Evans
Stl:Matthews
no way clowney doesnt go #1 imo
It is Star time not filler time.
Not far off, IMO. I think Manziel goes to either Jax, Cle, Oak, or someone trading up.
You don't see a QB going in the top 5?Elmgrovegnome not liking the QBs:
Yes OLT is a big need for the Falcons. I could see it. I don't like trading down to 6 though because the guy I want most is Matthews and EVERY year the best OTs go early. I could see Jacksonville, or Oakland taking Matthews. He is better than what they have at OLT.
Say it goes this way:
Houston - Mack
Atlanta - Robinson
Jacksonville - Matthews
Cleveland - Watkins
Oakland - Clowney
Rams - ?
The best players are off the board and the Rams would probably try to trade back a bit again. Would they take Evans at 6? Martin? Lewan? I think 6 is high for all of them. I really want them to get one of the top impact players out of this draft. It is Star time not filler time.
Maybe that means they trade with Dallas so they get Manziere. So the Rams move all the way out of the top ten completely. It would take one hell of a lot of good compensation for me to be happy about it. I usually don't get too uppity over drafts but this scenario would be a huge disappointment for me.
Alan, I think it's possible that a team might want to wait, or trade down, because there doesn't appear to be a consensus guy at QB this year. There are a BUNCH of really good developmental QB's, IMO, which kind of makes this draft unique. I don't think the Browns are in for a 1st round QB for sure. But, who knows, this is a very hard draft to predict.You don't see a QB going in the top 5?
Stop confirming my worst fears.DR RAM having my same nightmares:
Alan, I think it's possible that a team might want to wait, or trade down, because there doesn't appear to be a consensus guy at QB this year. There are a BUNCH of really good developmental QB's, IMO, which kind of makes this draft unique. I don't think the Browns are in for a 1st round QB for sure. But, who knows, this is a very hard draft to predict.
I could see a QB not going until about mid first round, but teams fall in love with guys, and QB's are typically overdrafted, as you know.