- Joined
- Jun 20, 2010
- Messages
- 35,576
- Name
- The Dude
I already like the under in the Rams game.
That's an intriguing situation. Week 1 last year yielded 51 points. And both teams (STL/AZ) ended the year with beast defenses.I know, right? 46 is one of the higher scores on the board.
I just don't see a high scoring affair game one with the Rams D.
It may be time for you to get yourself a avatar and make yourself at home..I have a feeling Seattle is going to lose their first two games...
That's an intriguing situation. Week 1 last year yielded 51 points. And both teams (STL/AZ) ended the year with beast defenses.
I know, right? 46 is one of the higher scores on the board.
I just don't see a high scoring affair game one with the Rams D.
My early Three-Team Parlay:
Over 55.5 Den/Ind
Washington to win getting the 2.5
Rams to win minus the 5
Spent three years bartending in S. Lake Tahoe and never won a three team parlay so, no I wouldn't take this to the bank...
NOW HIT SOMEBODY!
Ya, with Bradford coming back from injury and Minny with a possible rookie at QB, I see a lot of running and ball control kind of football.
This^^^I gotta think the Rams' switch in philosophy will lead to longer time of possession and a lower scoring affair. It's gonna be interesting.
Yep. Baily out. Britt new. SB coming off a season ending injury. Zach behind Robinson and Saffold with TA, Mason, and Cunningham too. I just can't see a big air attack before game 5 unless Rams get well behind. I'm suspecting ground and pound, field position, ball control.
And the over in the Giants at Lions game.I already like the under in the Rams game.