- Joined
- May 6, 2014
- Messages
- 12,091
- Name
- Charlie
I think its pretty clear Wentz is a far better backup than the noodle arm backups McVay has had in his 7 years. He's got the arm make all the throws. Something guys like Wolford, Perkins and Rypien did not have. And he's mobile.
When Baker Mayfield was here last year it was obvious his goal was to find a starting job somewhere. It was just an audition for that. And he found a starting job. I don't think Wentz is in the same position. I'm thinking he'd gladly accept a backup job with a McVay led team.
The only downside would be the way he plays. If Stafford goes down for say, half a season, I'm not sure Wentz could last the way he always initiates contact when he runs. But for a couple games he could be good enough to win with.
Then there is another aspect of his game he could be used. He could be used in a role similar to Taysom Hill. In short yardage situations he could run the wildcat and have the option to run or pass. Defenses couldn't key on the run with a true quarterback.
The only question is, will they try to bring him back and what would it cost?
When Baker Mayfield was here last year it was obvious his goal was to find a starting job somewhere. It was just an audition for that. And he found a starting job. I don't think Wentz is in the same position. I'm thinking he'd gladly accept a backup job with a McVay led team.
The only downside would be the way he plays. If Stafford goes down for say, half a season, I'm not sure Wentz could last the way he always initiates contact when he runs. But for a couple games he could be good enough to win with.
Then there is another aspect of his game he could be used. He could be used in a role similar to Taysom Hill. In short yardage situations he could run the wildcat and have the option to run or pass. Defenses couldn't key on the run with a true quarterback.
The only question is, will they try to bring him back and what would it cost?