He banned me because I posted this at Old Larry.I used to post on STLTODAY a long ass time ago. I can't stand that forum or the reporters from there. Especially Bernie. I remember him bashing fans for thinking the Rams were going to LA.

He banned me because I posted this at Old Larry.I used to post on STLTODAY a long ass time ago. I can't stand that forum or the reporters from there. Especially Bernie. I remember him bashing fans for thinking the Rams were going to LA.
I mean, what could he do differently? He hired two of the more sought after head coaches, gave them some rope, then fired them when they didn't deliver. He's also managed the cap fairly well considering all the high picks we've had. If anything, I think he needs to revisit the high salaries he affords players the coaches want to sign or retain at all costs. He might be a little too generous in that regard.He brings up a point with Demoff's record running the show. I don't think Demoff should still be in that role. He has done a very poor job.
I remember that! Old Larry was so fun to hate. He helped build THE ED if you didn't know.He banned me because I posted this at Old Larry.
![]()
Yeah, that's the one. I can't seem to find it though.I remember that! Old Larry was so fun to hate. He helped build THE ED if you didn't know.
I think you posted another one of the old man looking in a window and then looking back.
But X, I remember a different time after you agonizing about getting drawn back to the PD in a addictive sort of way, you created a profane last eff you letter to the board, with pictures of cuss words used so their program wouldn't remove the words from view. You were sure of a permanent ban after that...That final message was pure poetry..it was fukking literature!Yeah, that's the one. I can't seem to find it though.
Either way, yeah. He tattled on me and Bernie came to his rescue.
Can't exactly be tight on the cash when trying to bring in fresh blood to this organization. I mean, not exactly a destination for the past decade.I mean, what could he do differently? He hired two of the more sought after head coaches, gave them some rope, then fired them when they didn't deliver. He's also managed the cap fairly well considering all the high picks we've had. If anything, I think he needs to revisit the high salaries he affords players the coaches want to sign or retain at all costs. He might be a little too generous in that regard.
We don't judge draft picks on how we thought of the moves at the time, but on the result of the moves 3-5 years down the road. Demoff should be treated in kind. It's a results driven industry and the results have been bad. As to the cap, which teams are in bad cap situations? The only team that comes to mind are the Saints. If he is a cap genius, then demote him to cap guy. The results haven't been there with the guy running the show.I mean, what could he do differently? He hired two of the more sought after head coaches, gave them some rope, then fired them when they didn't deliver. He's also managed the cap fairly well considering all the high picks we've had. If anything, I think he needs to revisit the high salaries he affords players the coaches want to sign or retain at all costs. He might be a little too generous in that regard.
Dude has a point though. I appreciate his pragmatic view on most things to be honest.
That doesn't really answer my question though, FRO. I asked what he could have done differently. Saying "results" doesn't address that. I said he hired two of the top coaching candidates when they became available, gave them some rope, and then let them go when they didn't produce. What, beyond that, should he have done differently? He's not the GM, he doesn't make draft picks, doesn't design game plans, and doesn't build the roster. That's the responsibility of the HC and GM. I didn't suggest that because he's a good cap manager that he's beyond reproach. I only suggested that he turned that whole situation around and has done a good job with it ever since.We don't judge draft picks on how we thought of the moves at the time, but on the result of the moves 3-5 years down the road. Demoff should be treated in kind. It's a results driven industry and the results have been bad. As to the cap, which teams are in bad cap situations? The only team that comes to mind are the Saints. If he is a cap genius, then demote him to cap guy. The results haven't been there with the guy running the show.
Bernie's view is that is doesn't matter who the Rams hire as HC or who they have at QB, they are doomed to failure as long as Demoff and Kroenke are there. Not sure how pragmatic that really is.
He gave Fisher and Snead far too much rope. He could/should have stepped in after Schotty left and forced a legitimate offensive coordinator on Fisher and forced a different offensive approach. The results do matter though. Like the draft just because your pick was praised at the time, it depends on if it works or not. Same with the coach and GM. Many teams have been able to turn their respective teams around in the same time frame.That doesn't really answer my question though, FRO. I asked what he could have done differently. Saying "results" doesn't address that. I said he hired two of the top coaching candidates when they became available, gave them some rope, and then let them go when they didn't produce. What, beyond that, should he have done differently? He's not the GM, he doesn't make draft picks, doesn't design game plans, and doesn't build the roster. That's the responsibility of the HC and GM. I didn't suggest that because he's a good cap manager that he's beyond reproach. I only suggested that he turned that whole situation around and has done a good job with it ever since.
So again I ask; what - specifically - should he have done beyond what he's already done?
Well, okay, but that's really not something I wanna see the COO doing. Picking coordinators and dictating the way a head coach coaches while stepping on the GM to do it. If that's your preferred method of how a hierarchy should work, you might not attract too many legitimate candidates in either role. Nobody wants to take a job as GM or HC knowing that the COO has the power to supersede anything you wanna do. Especially after interviewing and getting hired on the basis of how *you* wanna build and run the team. I think this is just a case of shit rolling uphill. We get rid of players - not enough. Get rid of coaches - not enough. Get rid of the COO? Yeah, that should do it. If not, get rid of the Owner. If that doesn't work, get rid of homo sapiens as a whole. lol.He gave Fisher and Snead far too much rope. He could/should have stepped in after Schotty left and forced a legitimate offensive coordinator on Fisher and forced a different offensive approach. The results do matter though. Like the draft just because your pick was praised at the time, it depends on if it works or not. Same with the coach and GM. Many teams have been able to turn their respective teams around in the same time frame.
Guess Bernie has no sense of humor.That's a freakin classic!He banned me because I posted this at Old Larry.
![]()
Did you caption that, or was the photo just enough on its own?He banned me because I posted this at Old Larry.
![]()