I see your point but if you're going to move, why not make the commitment to "your" guy and go up to 2 to get pick of the litter? If I'm the MIN GM I do exactly that while A. Peterson is still a viable RB. I know it would be more costly but standing pat and "waiting for the draft" to come to them is what has gotten them Ponder. I think they are definitely in play as a trade partner.
A man can hope! I, too, would be surprised by a deal such as we got from WAS but I don't think a 1, 2 and a 1 next year is out of the question.I agree with that and I will add that Tampa will be in the mix as well so those two may end up in a little bidding war. It's not probable to get what we did from the Redskins but the remote possibility warms my heart lol.
I'm willing to take that today! C'mon Les, make it happen!BRF the draft value chart would tell us that swapping the 2 for the 8 would be worth a first and a third next year along with this years second I believe.
I thought I read that somewhere that the points equal out with that deal. But there could be added pressure because SIX teams in the top eight slots need a QB. That kind of pressure makes normally smart people do very dumb things. Maybe not Schneider level dumb but one can hope lol.
Is that trade chart even relevant anymore? I thought it changed drastically after the rookie pay scale was implemented.BRF the draft value chart would tell us that swapping the 2 for the 8 would be worth a first and a third next year along with this years second I believe.
I thought I read that somewhere that the points equal out with that deal. But there could be added pressure because SIX teams in the top eight slots need a QB. That kind of pressure makes normally smart people do very dumb things. Maybe not Schneider level dumb but one can hope lol.
Is that trade chart even relevant anymore? I thought it changed drastically after the rookie pay scale was implemented.
They have Norv Turner. He doesn't seem like he'd be a Johnny Football guy.